From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2F2DDED2 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:11:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46AE192E.4080205@intel.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:00:30 -0700 From: "Kok, Auke" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][RFC] lro: Kconfig and Makefile References: <200707301724.45781.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20070730172535.15993806@oldman.hamilton.local> <46AE1383.3050305@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <46AE1383.3050305@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , Stefan Roscher , netdev , linux-kernel , Christoph Raisch , linux-ppc , Jan-Bernd Themann , Marcus Eder , Andrew Gallatin , Stephen Hemminger , David Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jeff Garzik wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> Why make this a user selectable option at all? Unless you want >> to deal with out of tree drivers (not my problem), it should be hidden >> to avoid having to explain an support it. > > In this case it's an optional library kernel module. That seems to be a > common setup for library modules. We do the same with CONFIG_MII and > drivers/net/mii.ko as well. > > Originally it was done purely in the Makefile, but that does not account > for net drivers in sub-directories (or out of tree as you point out). speaking of that, shouldn't there be a NETIF_F_LRO ? Auke