From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <46CB0ED8.50806@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:12:08 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/20] bootwrapper: Declare udelay() in ops.h. References: <20070820173920.GA30546@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070820173955.GH30562@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070821023943.GI15469@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070821023943.GI15469@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:39:55PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >>Declarations in various users are removed. >> >>Signed-off-by: Scott Wood > > > Hrm... it should go in a header, certainly, but I wonder if io.h would > be more suitable than the already rather bloated ops.h. It's not really I/O either... Maybe we should make a misc.h to put stuff in that doesn't fit anywhere else and doesn't really warrant its own header file? -Scott