From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6411ADDEC8 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:02:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46CC9655.3000109@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:02:29 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DI BACCO ANTONIO - technolabs Subject: Re: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:137 (linux_denx_2.6.19.2) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , DI BACCO ANTONIO - technolabs wrote: > Sending ioctls to a socket I receive the following problem (only the > first time I send a ioctl): > > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:137 You're not supposed to nest a spin_lock_bh inside a spin_lock_irq. fs_ioctl() does this anyway, hence the warning. -Scott