From: David Hawkins <dwh@ovro.caltech.edu>
To: Leonid <Leonid@a-k-a.net>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: PCI target implementation on AMCC PPC CPUs
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:15:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E05FFD.3020605@ovro.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <406A31B117F2734987636D6CCC93EE3C022417D2@ehost011-3.exch011.intermedia.net>
Hi Leonid,
> Does somebody have any experience of using AMCC PPC chips (such as
> PPC440ep) or any other PPC at all as PCI target (slave)? PPC440ep has
> PCI-PLB bridge which certainly can be configured as slave. CPU will need
> to do configuration and then I assume another CPU (PCI host) will be
> able to access all memories via the bridge including peripherals'
> controllers. Slave CPU involvement would be minimal then.
>
> Can anybody point me to design like this or to that end to any SW design
> where PPC CPU works as PCI slave?
I have an application where I want to communicate with up
to 20 cPCI slaves per cPCI chassis, where the slave devices
each use a PowerPC based processor. (The masters happen
to be x86 CPUs; because I have them).
I looked at the 440EP using the Yosemite board
http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/powerpc_440ep.pdf
and the Freescale MPC8349E
http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/powerpc_mpc8349e.pdf
I had some trouble the with AMCC chips; the DMA controller
operation was weird, and AMCC tech support was pretty
much useless.
Freescale's technical (design) support is great, and they
(the software developers; Kim, Timur, etc) are actively
maintaining/contributing to git trees for u-boot and Linux.
If you can change processors, I'd recommend any Freescale
part over an AMCC part.
I'm working on a cPCI board design at the moment, you're
welcome to look at the design;
* PowerPC
* Altera Stratix II FPGAs
* dual 8-bit 1GHz ADCs
http://www.ovro.caltech.edu/~dwh/carma_board/
Regards,
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-06 18:24 finding out the processor frequency Leisner, Martin
2007-09-06 18:43 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-06 19:15 ` Josh Boyer
2007-09-06 19:15 ` PCI target implementation on AMCC PPC CPUs Leonid
2007-09-06 20:15 ` David Hawkins [this message]
2007-09-06 23:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-09-06 23:39 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-06 20:26 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-11 9:13 ` Matthias Fuchs
2007-09-11 17:32 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-11 18:17 ` David Hawkins
2007-09-12 7:17 ` Matthias Fuchs
2007-09-12 16:04 ` David Hawkins
[not found] <46E0B178.00C522.05513@m5-81.163.com>
2007-09-07 2:13 ` Leonid
2007-09-07 2:34 ` David Hawkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E05FFD.3020605@ovro.caltech.edu \
--to=dwh@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=Leonid@a-k-a.net \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).