From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD5ADDEC6 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:00:01 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46E9887D.3090200@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:59:09 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add Freescale DMA and DMA channel to Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt file. References: <11891624353752-git-send-email-wei.zhang@freescale.com> <1189162437484-git-send-email-wei.zhang@freescale.com> <3b29878a7d3d1b14f84b5d3b182cdb98@kernel.crashing.org> <20070910032529.GA27828@localhost.localdomain> <46B96294322F7D458F9648B60E15112C85D61B@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> <20070911141907.GF1932@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <46B96294322F7D458F9648B60E15112C85D755@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> <20070912151938.GA15561@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070913145236.GC32043@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <045c872e8a912921da3259586595c0f3@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <045c872e8a912921da3259586595c0f3@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Zhang Wei-r63237 , paulus@samba.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>>> What tree are you using? Commit >>>> 804ace8881d211ac448082e871dd312132393049 >>>> in Paul's git tree should have fixed that. >>> >>> Strange, I don't see that commit -- maybe gitweb is broken, or >>> maybe the patch was superseded, or maybe it just disappeared? >>> It's still shown in patchworks with this commit id fwiw. >> >> I see it here: >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git;a=commit;h=804ace8881d211ac448082e871dd312132393049 >> > > Ah okay. The gitweb search functionality is broken. > > Shouldn't this patch have gone to .23? It's a pretty important > bugfix I think. Probably not, in the absence of a specific failing match that's already in .23. It has the potential to break things that were working by chance. -Scott