From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30B7DDE09 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:10:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <47011BED.8020206@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:10:21 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm: Describe multi-user ram in its own device node. References: <20070928190616.GB20213@loki.buserror.net> <20070929003005.59afc2a0@kernel.crashing.org> <08C0C9CB-C958-4B95-81B8-D0677CBA4399@kernel.crashing.org> <20070929104917.1585737e@kernel.crashing.org> <1B684498-FC47-4F01-A72E-DD27B259613A@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <1B684498-FC47-4F01-A72E-DD27B259613A@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Timur Tabi , PowerPC dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Sep 29, 2007, at 1:49 AM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: >> cpms have dpram, qe has muram. these two are the same stuff in fact. >> Or you are asking about have QE stuff utilize such a binding at the >> same pass? > > I was asking about both these things. As stated in the commit message, QE can use this; it just needs a compatible entry in the data node. -Scott