From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F024ADDF69 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:27:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <470268F1.9000504@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:51:13 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm: Describe multi-user ram in its own device node. References: <20070928190616.GB20213@loki.buserror.net> <20070929003005.59afc2a0@kernel.crashing.org> <08C0C9CB-C958-4B95-81B8-D0677CBA4399@kernel.crashing.org> <20070929104917.1585737e@kernel.crashing.org> <1B684498-FC47-4F01-A72E-DD27B259613A@kernel.crashing.org> <47011BED.8020206@freescale.com> <47025A72.10404@freescale.com> <47026884.4040909@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <47026884.4040909@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: PowerPC dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood wrote: > I was thinking of just removing the muram code from qe_lib, and having > it use the code in cpm_common.c. Do we want to have the QE library include CPM code at this point? I know we want to merge some QE and CPM code, but I would rather do that in one shot than piecemeal. > BTW, searching the entire device tree for a node with the name > "data-only", regardless of context, seems a bit insane to me. Yes, I noticed that, too. -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale