From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.semihalf.com (mail.semihalf.com [83.12.36.68]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1203DDDE39 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:10:32 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4715ED92.80503@semihalf.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:10:10 +0200 From: Marian Balakowicz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] [POWERPC] TQM5200 DTS References: <47075FA7.3030108@semihalf.com> <4708BFDD.9020900@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: >> + memory { >> + device_type = "memory"; >> + reg = <00000000 04000000>; // 64MB >> + }; >> + >> + soc5200@f0000000 { > > I think we're moving to the convetion of naming these nodes > "soc@" now. (You can drop the 5200 for the node name) Seems that this will not be painless, U-boot uses hardcoded paths with 'soc5200', so the appropriate patch will be needed. That may be ok for new boards but what do we do with lite5200, where U-boot upgrade is not always an option? m.