From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.semihalf.com (mail.semihalf.com [83.12.36.68]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C77DDEAB for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:42:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4715F51D.2060000@semihalf.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:42:21 +0200 From: Marian Balakowicz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [POWERPC 03/15] [POWERPC] TQM5200 board support References: <47075FA7.3030108@semihalf.com> <4708C0DA.2040606@semihalf.com> <20071008150449.GB4289@loki.buserror.net> In-Reply-To: <20071008150449.GB4289@loki.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood wrote: > >> +void tqm5200_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m) >> +{ >> + struct device_node* np = of_find_all_nodes(NULL); >> + const char *model = NULL; >> + >> + if (np) >> + model = of_get_property(np, "model", NULL); >> + >> + seq_printf(m, "vendor\t\t: Freescale Semiconductor\n"); >> + seq_printf(m, "machine\t\t: %s\n", model ? model : "unknown"); >> + >> + of_node_put(np); >> +} > > Get rid of this. Agree, that may be overhead in some cases. But there would be also cases where printing out a machine name would be informative. CM5200 is one such example, there are several variants of the hw and platform name is too generic. Other situation would be adding compatible='mpc5200-generic' platform where platform name would not provide any details. m.