From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net (srv5.dvmed.net [207.36.208.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DBBDDEC7 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:14:43 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4717B09B.3060800@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:14:35 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] FEC - fast ethernet controller for mpc52xx References: <20071014075511.GC3000@nd47.coderock.org> <4713BA1C.2050604@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Domen Puncer List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > On 10/15/07, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Domen Puncer wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged >>> when bestcomm goes in (any time now?). >>> >>> It's split into four parts: >>> 1 - device tree >>> 2 - small bestcomm change >>> 3 - the actual driver >>> 4 - phy part of the driver >> patches #3 and #4 need to be combined together. >> >> Are the arch people OK with patches #1 and #2? > > Jeff, > > The bestcomm patches and patch 1 & 2 from this series are now in > Linus' tree. That clears the way for the FEC driver when Domen > reposts it. (In other words; there is nothing left in arch land > blocking this driver) > except a resend combining patches 3 and 4 as requested :)