From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: PowerPC dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Audio codec device tree entries
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:40:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <471F6761.3030405@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910710240823v2022661ftb1b754a86cab88f3@mail.gmail.com>
Jon Smirl wrote:
> I see your point about putting the child node onto the control bus.
> ac97 is both a control and data bus. For the i2s case the child should
> go onto the i2c bus.
I know AC97 is *also* a control bus, but treating I2S and AC97 differently is
bad, IMHO. If you're going to put the child node in the AC97 node, you should
also put it in the I2S node.
The 8610 has an SSI that can operate as either AC97 or I2S. If I want to switch
from AC97 to I2S, I should not have to move the child node out of the AC97 node.
I should instead just add an I2C node and point to it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-23 1:59 Audio codec device tree entries Jon Smirl
2007-10-23 2:57 ` David Gibson
2007-10-23 3:57 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-23 8:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-23 15:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-23 16:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-23 22:29 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 14:13 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:00 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:07 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 23:52 ` David Gibson
2007-10-24 15:16 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:20 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:28 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:43 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:54 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 16:01 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:39 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:41 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:47 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:38 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:41 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:52 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 17:01 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 17:13 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 17:13 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 19:31 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 19:41 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 19:56 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 0:04 ` David Gibson
2007-10-25 0:17 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 0:38 ` David Gibson
2007-10-25 3:11 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 16:14 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 23:55 ` David Gibson
2007-10-24 15:23 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:40 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-10-24 15:54 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:08 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:19 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 0:01 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=471F6761.3030405@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).