From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5E5DDEEA for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:10:27 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <47222D86.1000502@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:10:14 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joakim Tjernlund Subject: Re: Porting to /arch/powerpc References: <020001c81756$0fc78760$5267a8c0@Jocke> In-Reply-To: <020001c81756$0fc78760$5267a8c0@Jocke> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> The fs_enet driver doesn't currently support phy-less >> directly, but you >> may be able to do something with the fixed phy driver. > > How is PHY less support supposed to be impl.? I would like > to do the same for ucc_geth. I once sent a patch that made > the PHY optional, but it never made into the driver. Basically, the driver needs to assume the link is up if there's no phy-handle in the device tree, rather than error out. -Scott