From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5E3DDEBF for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:52:27 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <47225327.2070103@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:50:47 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: reg adjust_total_lowmem References: <4dd2a2ce0710252051pe83a943q48f52d148f5a9603@mail.gmail.com> <524E69ED-899B-452F-B593-44499C5181A3@kernel.crashing.org> <20071026194005.GA4571@loki.buserror.net> In-Reply-To: <20071026194005.GA4571@loki.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Surya Ravikiran List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:04:19AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> The reason you have 192M is that lowmem is the total amount of memory >> that can be covered by up to three CAM entries. In the case of >> setting mem=252M that max that three CAM entries can cover is 192M (64 >> +64+64). You should be able to access the other 60M via HIGHMEM. > > Why doesn't it just use a 256M mapping, and not access the last 4M? Not to mention, why highmem and not just normal TLB0 mappings for the extra pages? -Scott