From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E870DDDDB for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:22:28 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47287339.6040404@ru.mvista.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:21:13 +0300 From: Valentine Barshak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PowerPC: 440GRx Rainier board support. References: <20071030164511.GA21973@ru.mvista.com> <20071030151608.28a2d706@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20071030151608.28a2d706@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:45:11 +0300 > Valentine Barshak wrote: > >> The following patches add PowerPC 440GRx Rainier board support. >> The board is almost identical to Sequoia, but doesn't have USB >> and FPU is not supported. > > So why do we need anything other than the DTS and the defconfig? I > would think the sequoia wrapper and platform files would suffice > completely for this. Yes, they would, but how to handle the board name in this case? I mean the resulting image would be cuImage.sequoia for rainier and the DTS board name has to be sequoia for rainier too. I don't now, may be it's not a big deal to call rainier a sequoia though. What do you think? Thanks, Valentine. > > josh