From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.genesi-usa.com (mithrandir.softwarenexus.net [66.98.186.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1BADDE2F for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 08:03:58 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4730D743.9050509@genesi-usa.com> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:06:11 +0000 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [RFC] Rework of i2c-mpc.c - Freescale i2c driver References: <9e4733910711050714l2aa3a5eeqf5327c3e0d8ca490@mail.gmail.com> <472F7247.9070106@freescale.com> <9e4733910711051230w2d90a710idec3dcfc2e0f5c16@mail.gmail.com> <472F8267.8070106@freescale.com> <472F9086.2060606@genesi-usa.com> <20071106183210.50058019@hyperion.delvare> <4730B817.3000201@genesi-usa.com> <20071106213132.58ba7e1c@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20071106213132.58ba7e1c@hyperion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Tjernlund , i2c@lm-sensors.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Matt, > >> WRT cell-index this is an index of the bus on the chip (not the logical >> i2c bus but the physical difference between two i2c controllers) and >> then any i2c devices which need to be communicated with would be >> child nodes, their reg property reflecting their slave address, is >> that not correct? > > I am not familiar with the OF tree, I can't tell, sorry. > Well, it's how board designers tell you what chip is at what address :) -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations