From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail0.scram.de (mail0.scram.de [78.47.204.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail0.scram.de", Issuer "scram e.V. CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA704DDE21 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:00:14 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <473AE325.8070901@scram.de> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:59:33 +0100 From: Jochen Friedrich MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix fs_enet module build References: <4739EDA8.6020800@scram.de> <20071113.210926.97725854.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20071113.210926.97725854.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi David, > This is truly ugly and creates an unnecessarily hard to > maintain and complex driver. > > Please find a way to fix this for real, so that the > PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING ifdef is not necessary at all and > things get built modular or not naturally as we handle > things for other cases like this. I know it's ugly, however, module building is completely broken right now and I just want to provide a quick and ugly fix until both that ppc->powerpc transition and the new binding transition are over. Noone wants to touch the old stuff any more as it's a pita and it's already scheduled for removal in a couple of months. Thanks, Jochen