From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Received: from mail.dvmed.net (srv5.dvmed.net [207.36.208.214])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F767DDE24
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:30:30 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <4742389E.5080700@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:30:06 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratum #2 (RGMII Timing)
References: <20071105121530.5c38fbb7.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
	<20071119173652.55e385b2.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071119173652.55e385b2.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, paulus@samba.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:15:30 -0600
> Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello all,
>>
>> the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
>> according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below).  Basically the
>> most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay
>> modes; one for TX delay only, and the other for RX delay only (i.e, not
>> both at the same time).
>>
>> Please review, and since this affects both netdev and powerpc trees,
>> one maintainer should ack them for the other to push upstream (i.e,
>> Kumar acks them, and Leo picks them up to go through netdev or the
>> other way around; either way is fine with me).  I'm hoping they're
>> trivial enough to go in 2.6.24.
>>
> Kumar, Leo, 
> 
> re-ping due to (a) it's been 2 weeks and (b) Anton Vorontsov has since
> issued his Tested-by.
> 
> Might I suggest Kumar ack the powerpc patches, and Leo/Jeff apply 5/5
> to go through netdev?

FWIW I just got back from vacation...  I'm grabbing what DaveM has 
collected into davem/netdev-2.6.git, and then going from there...

	Jeff