From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C81DDD0D for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:23:42 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47435E67.9080706@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:23:35 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Loeliger , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: dtc: Add testcases for tree checks References: <20071120052423.GC4356@localhost.localdomain> <20071120220309.GB13156@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20071120220309.GB13156@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:09:17AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: >> Actually, this is the official third time now that it would have >> been significantly nicer had you been using git for patches as >> it does correctly handle excute permissions properly in patches. > > Well, yes. But, IMO, every time anyone other that you or I has > commented on one of these patches as it goes past counts as an > occasion when it's better that I've been using patches, rather than > pushing to you direct with git. Generating patches with "git-format-patch -M" isn't the same as pushing directly... -Scot