From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
To: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer functionality
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:48:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47516646.9000803@scram.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071126142906.19642.45540.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Vitaly,
> With that patch fixed.c now fully emulates MDIO bus, thus no need
> to duplicate PHY layer functionality. That, in turn, drastically
> simplifies the code, and drops down line count.
>
> As an additional bonus, now there is no need to register MDIO bus
> for each PHY, all emulated PHYs placed on the platform fixed MDIO bus.
> There is also no more need to pre-allocate PHYs via .config option,
> this is all now handled dynamically.
>
> p.s. Don't even try to understand patch content! Better: apply patch
> and look into resulting drivers/net/phy/fixed.c.
>
If i understand your code correctly, you seem to rely on the fact
that fixed_phy_add() is called before the fixed MDIO bus is scanned for
devices. How is this supposed to work for modules or for the
PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING mode where the device tree is no longer scanned
during fs_soc initialization but during device initialization?
I tried to add fixed-phy support to fs_enet, but the fixed phy is not
found this way.
--- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/phy.h>
+#include <linux/phy_fixed.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
@@ -1174,8 +1175,24 @@ static int __devinit find_phy(struct device_node *np,
struct device_node *phynode, *mdionode;
struct resource res;
int ret = 0, len;
+ const u32 *data;
+ struct fixed_phy_status status = {};
+
+ data = of_get_property(np, "fixed-link", NULL);
+ if (data) {
+ status.link = 1;
+ status.duplex = data[1];
+ status.speed = data[2];
+
+ ret = fixed_phy_add(PHY_POLL, data[0], &status);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ snprintf(fpi->bus_id, 16, PHY_ID_FMT, 0, *data);
+ return 0;
+ }
- const u32 *data = of_get_property(np, "phy-handle", &len);
+ data = of_get_property(np, "phy-handle", &len);
if (!data || len != 4)
return -EINVAL;
Thanks,
Jochen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-26 14:29 [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer functionality Vitaly Bordug
2007-11-26 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] fsl_soc: add support for gianfar for fixed-link property Vitaly Bordug
2007-11-26 15:04 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-11-27 11:39 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-11-27 13:17 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-11-27 13:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-11-27 14:01 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-11-26 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: Vitesse 7385 PHY is not connected to the MDIO bus Vitaly Bordug
2007-12-01 13:48 ` Jochen Friedrich [this message]
2007-12-01 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer functionality Vitaly Bordug
2007-12-01 21:34 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-01 22:22 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-12-01 23:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-12-02 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHYlayer functionality Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-02 12:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-01 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer functionality Jeff Garzik
2007-12-01 22:16 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-12-04 20:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-05 1:22 ` Vitaly Bordug
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-06 22:51 Vitaly Bordug
2008-01-18 6:45 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47516646.9000803@scram.de \
--to=jochen@scram.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vitb@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).