From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa2.bezeqint.net (sa2.bezeqint.net [192.115.104.16]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80471DDDF3 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 18:08:35 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47525130.2000205@compulab.co.il> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:31:12 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: CPM2 USB host driver References: <200711301145.52926.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <200711301330.25100.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20071130124801.GA13141@localhost.localdomain> <200711301628.33526.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> In-Reply-To: <200711301628.33526.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > >> I tried to forward-port FHCI from Freescale 2.6.11 kernels. Twice. >> But these efforts always stumbled over more important tasks. > > Do you think I start from the FHCI driver provided by Freescale for 2.6.11, > from the cpm2usb driver or from scratch ? The cmp2usb is old and crappy, and I had no time at all to update it. So if the choice was to start from cpm2usb or from scratch, I'd choose to start from scratch. > Both the cpm2usb and FHCI drivers seem to use the packet-level interface. Is > there any reason not to use the transaction-level interface ? > Best regards, > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.