From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: make 64K huge pages more reliable
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:51:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47547A79.2060206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071203020648.GF26919@localhost.localdomain>
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:03:16PM -0600, Jon Tollefson wrote:
>> This patch adds reliability to the 64K huge page option by making use of
>> the PMD for 64K huge pages when base pages are 4k. So instead of a 12
>> bit pte it would be 7 bit pmd and a 5 bit pte. The pgd and pud offsets
>> would continue as 9 bits and 7 bits respectively. This will allow the
>> pgtable to fit in one base page. This patch would have to be applied
>> after part 1.
>
> Hrm.. shouldn't we just ban 64K hugepages on a 64K base page size
> setup? There's not a whole lot of point to it, after all...
>
Actually, it sounds to me like an ideal way to benchmark the efficiency of the
hugepage implementation and VM effects, without the TLB performance obscuring
the results.
I agree that it's not something people will want to do very often, but the same
can be said about quite a lot of strange things that we allow just because
there's no fundamental reason why they cannot be.
-- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-03 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 5:03 [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: make 64K huge pages more reliable Jon Tollefson
2007-12-03 2:06 ` David Gibson
2007-12-03 21:33 ` Jon Tollefson
2007-12-03 21:51 ` Chris Snook [this message]
2007-12-04 0:28 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47547A79.2060206@redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).