From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (E23SMTP05.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e23smtp05.au.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D46DDE1B for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:58:11 +1100 (EST) Received: from sd0109e.au.ibm.com (d23rh905.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.225]) by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lB4Ew5ac006561 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:58:05 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by sd0109e.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lB4F1jbB280852 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:01:46 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lB4EvrwT023426 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:57:54 +1100 Message-ID: <47556AE5.8010708@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:27:41 +0530 From: Kamalesh Babulal MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected References: <474D0AAC.5010005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071127225328.9e3f3827.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <474D15FF.5080508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071127232552.ad16e95c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <474E5CAC.9000108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071129003533.54b4b20e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071130063929.GD2754@fattire.cabal.ca> <20071129230047.1b482562.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071129230204.8698f47e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <474FBB86.5000004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071204122005.GA27286@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071204122005.GA27286@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , LKML , Kyle McMartin , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , Balbir Singh List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > >>> So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not? >> Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4. > > just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device > init), not just a message, right? > > Ingo > -- Hi Ingo, This softlockup is seen in the 2.6.24-rc4 either and looks like a message because this is seen while running tbench and machine continues running other test's after the softlockup messages and some times seen with the bootup, but the machines reaches the login prompt and able to continue running tests. -- Thanks & Regards, Kamalesh Babulal, Linux Technology Center, IBM, ISTL.