From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F85DDFA2 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:07:54 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47698826.4040209@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:07:50 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] device_type/compatible cleanups References: <20071219203447.GA18285@localhost.localdomain> <47698054.1060909@freescale.com> <20071219204853.GA20972@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20071219204853.GA20972@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:34:28PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >> Anton Vorontsov wrote: >>> Scott, I didn't add "fsl,cpm-muram" stuff, it just doesn't make >>> sense now: qe and cpm anyway using different code base. >> That should change. > > Sure. When that will change, then it will be sane to change the users, > I think. ;-) Not the vice versa. The device tree should describe the hardware, not the degree of unnecessary code forking/duplication currently present in Linux. -Scott