From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com (e6.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e6.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F98DDDF0 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:54 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBR5lboP006297 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:47:37 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lBR5jobk135740 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:45:50 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lBR5jonb002246 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:45:50 -0500 Message-ID: <47733C01.1080002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:15:37 +0530 From: Balbir Singh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FUJITA Tomonori Subject: Re: SCSI errors on powerpc with 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 References: <20071224044850.GA11449@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071227121108L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <47732C41.7000003@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071227134335O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20071227134335O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:08:25 +0530 > Balbir Singh wrote: > >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530 >>> Balbir Singh wrote: >>> >> [snip] >> >>> I might break the IOMMU code. Can you reproduce it easily? If so, >>> reverting my IOMMU patches (I've attached a patch to revert them) fix >>> the problem? >> [snip] >> >> >> Yes, this patch fixes the problem for me. > > Thanks, so you can reproduce it easily, right? > Yes, quite easily > The problem is that I don't want to revert these changes. I'll see > how these changes cause the problem shortly. I'll try and find some bandwidth to review/test the patches and help you figure out the right solution. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL