From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031C9DE0D4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:36:24 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47868191.4000901@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:35:29 -0600 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC References: <9e4733910801010925j67192427o4e0e824b9d7e0ad0@mail.gmail.com> <20080107182853.GA17312@sirena.org.uk> <20080110034919.GI17816@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910801092141m5d4476d0l1c081307fd5c1969@mail.gmail.com> <1199961015.19903.270.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47863C31.50309@freescale.com> <478641E3.5070404@freescale.com> <9e4733910801101210w5846bb4ds38a603a489ef0522@mail.gmail.com> <47867C80.4050408@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Olof Johansson , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > Nit: node name should be either i2s@16000 (the mode that it is in), or > sound@16000 (if you feel that this node encapsulates the concept of a > sound device enough). Well, SSI stands for "Synchronous Serial Interface" (although it's capable of asynchronous communication as well). From the manual: "The SSI is a full-duplex, serial port that allows the chip to communicate with a variety of serial devices. These serial devices can be standard CODer-DECoder (CODECs), Digital Signal Processors (DSPs), microprocessors, peripherals, and popular industry audio CODECs that implement the inter-IC sound bus standard (I2S) and Intel AC97 standard." It might an I2S device in this case, but it could be an AC97 device in some other case. It all depends on how the board is wired. Do we really want to change the name of an SOC device based on what it's connected to? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale