From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FE4DDDF2 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:27:57 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4787A71E.7000509@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:27:58 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: raul.moreno@telvent.abengoa.com Subject: Re: 2.6.22-ppc8xx fec.c bugs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , raul.moreno@telvent.abengoa.com wrote: > I didn't know ppc was deprecated. Why is it so? Having separate 32 and 64 bit powerpc trees was a maintenance headache. The way arch/ppc is structured was a maintenance headache. > I have been using this architecture since I started with Linux (not too > long ago) because I manage a mpc866 processor. mpc866 chips are supported in arch/powerpc. > Do you mean that I should port to arch/powerpc? Yes. -Scott