From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Rune Torgersen <runet@innovsys.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Problems with PCI on 8280
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:18:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <478FE248.1030101@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DCEAAC0833DD314AB0B58112AD99B93B039BA0D6@ismail.innsys.innovsys.com>
Rune Torgersen wrote:
> >From: Scott Wood
> >Are you using cuImage, or a regular uImage with a device-tree-aware u-boot
>
> cuImage for now.
>
> >If the former, try commenting out the call to fixup_pci() in
> >arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-pq2.c and let me know if that changes anything.
>
> Did that, That made our PCI bus fail completely
Hmm... that suggests that something in u-boot's setup is either
incorrect, or (more likely in this case) doesn't match the device tree.
Or maybe it's the bus parking/arbiter tweaking at the end that u-boot is
missing.
> We have our PCI set up to ONE 512MB outbound range doing all three.
> (I can see where you'd save on mem usage by doing two)
>
> I do see a bug tho.
> In our case prefetch is 256MB, memio is 128MB.
> the calculation for outbound wiondow 1 sets the size to ~(pref+mmio-1).
> That only works if the resulting size is a power of 2.
Ah. Yes, I was assuming both windows would be the same size. The code
should be changed to check that, and if any conditions for setting
PCIBRx/PCIMSKx fail, check to see if the firmware-provided values work
(and if not, bail without touching anything).
> If we comment out the rewrite of the outbound windows, we get PCI to work.
> But since our u-boot sets everything up correctly (Including prefecable
> memory) we should not need this? or is it rewriting the device tree in
> some way?
You shouldn't need it... I'd compare the register values u-boot sets
with the values the corrected fixup_pci() sets (including the soc regs
at the end). Something must be different.
There is no device tree re-writing; it tries to program the hardware to
match what's in the device tree.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-17 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 21:33 Problems with PCI on 8280 Rune Torgersen
2008-01-17 22:02 ` Scott Wood
2008-01-17 23:05 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-17 23:18 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2008-01-18 0:27 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-01-18 17:07 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=478FE248.1030101@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=runet@innovsys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).