From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wrs.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFE6DDF28 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:27:18 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4798A043.2060006@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:27:15 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Powerpc support for SBC8560 board References: <11997159321859-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <9C12D718-CEE4-4533-BD88-F3F8A4CA0BE9@kernel.crashing.org> <47989DED.8010303@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> Kumar Gala wrote: >>> >>> Have we closed on these patches? >>> >>> the sbc8560 is the last board that we need to close on for me to >>> kill 85xx in arch/ppc. >> >> I think so. For the 8560, the last issue was David wanting >> the dts to have the address cells =2 on localbus-like nodes >> and I've not heard any negative feedback on how I did it (yet). >> >> I'll resend the 8xxx patches as a lump today for the sake >> of merge convenience, with the legacy_serial change and the >> extra simplebus that Scott asked for factored out separate. > > ok that would be great. Will that include an updated sbc834x set? Yes, the sbc834x, sbc8548 and sbc8560. Thanks, Paul. > > - k