From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B08DDE1F for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:12:34 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <479A27AF.5080701@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:17:19 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [POWERPC] fsl_soc, legacy_serial: add support for "soc" compatible matching References: <20080124151850.GA15190@localhost.localdomain> <20080124154010.GE23246@localhost.localdomain> <9C11FC54-29CF-4027-97C3-FEB1EBA2D78B@kernel.crashing.org> <20080125171355.GA9879@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20080125171355.GA9879@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Yoder Stuart List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Freescale soc register space: "fsl,soc" > generic soc device: "soc" (or maybe "linux,soc" better?) > > I know, Scott Wood is pushing "xxxx-immr" thing forward... but > I don't like that name because SOC isn't only device with the > Internal Memory Mapped Registers. If you look in the manual for xxxx, you'll find something called "Internal Memory Mapped Registers". Thus, the name xxxx-immr. >(Think of QE placed outside of "soc"/"immr" node). When is the QE ever placed outside the soc/immr/ccsr node? The QE registers are part of the IMMR/CCSR. -Scott