From: "A. Nolson" <alohanono@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: V4 FX12 and PLB TEMAC: no space for user logic?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:33:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B31BCD.9010203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B2B94A.6090600@dave-tech.it>
Hi ,
I am now developing my own IPs and when I try to synthesize normally I
get an error because the router finds no place to fit everything. I have
resynthesized using the option:
XIL_PAR_ENABLE_LEGALIZER=1 ( loading the program with that variable on >
XIL_PAR_ENABLE_LEGALIZER=1 xps). It took so much time because it uses a
much more consuming algorithm but I managed to build it correctly.
Regards,
/A
llandre wrote:
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> I've just had a look at the messages you generously posted in the ml
> about your experience with linux on V4 FX12 FPGA.
> I'd like to ask your opinion about FX12 practical usability in this
> context (gigabit PLB TEMAC/linux).
> In this message
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/16816
>
> you say the device is completely full. If I understand correctly your
> system provides just the devices required to run the bandwidth test so
> it seems there is no room for user logic (I think you did not even add
> the memory controller required to access the NOR Flash containing
> bootloader, kernel image and root fs that is clearly mandatory for
> standalone product). Is that true? If it is, this limits a lot the
> flexibility of this architecture in this configuration. What do you think?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> llandre
>
> DAVE Electronics System House - R&D Department
> web: http://www.dave.eu
> email: r&d2@dave-tech.it
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-13 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 9:32 V4 FX12 and PLB TEMAC: no space for user logic? llandre
2008-02-13 16:33 ` A. Nolson [this message]
2008-02-13 21:00 ` Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B31BCD.9010203@gmail.com \
--to=alohanono@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).