From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 8xx: timebase frequency should not depend on bus-frequency
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:06:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BDD9E2.5050007@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080221195918.GA14636@localhost.localdomain>
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:48:23PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
>> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c
>>> index 184f998..0d9f75c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c
>>> @@ -111,17 +111,12 @@ void __init mpc8xx_calibrate_decr(void)
>>>
>>> /* Processor frequency is MHz.
>>> */
>>> - ppc_tb_freq = 50000000;
>>> - if (!get_freq("bus-frequency", &ppc_tb_freq)) {
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR "WARNING: Estimating decrementer frequency "
>>> - "(not found)\n");
>>> - }
>>> - ppc_tb_freq /= 16;
>>> ppc_proc_freq = 50000000;
>>> if (!get_freq("clock-frequency", &ppc_proc_freq))
>>> printk(KERN_ERR "WARNING: Estimating processor frequency "
>>> "(not found)\n");
>>>
>>> + ppc_tb_freq = ppc_proc_freq / 16;
>> Shouldn't we just use the timebase-frequency property?
>
> Nope. Most u-boots currently do not setup timebase-frequency, and if
> they are setting it up, they're doing it wrong, in sense that Linux
> overwrites timebase setup (yeah, in this regard MPC8xx is special).
Current u-boots don't support device trees at all on 8xx. The most
recent 8xx FDT patch I saw called get_tbclk() to fill in
timebase-frequency; does get_tbclk() not work?
Obviously, when booting with a cuImage we can't use u-boot's value,
since it's not in the bd_t. In that case, we should fix the wrapper's
calculation of the timebase frequency.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-21 19:45 [PATCH] [POWERPC] 8xx: timebase frequency should not depend on bus-frequency Anton Vorontsov
2008-02-21 19:48 ` Scott Wood
2008-02-21 19:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-02-21 20:06 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2008-02-21 21:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-02-21 21:20 ` Scott Wood
2008-02-21 23:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-02-22 13:01 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BDD9E2.5050007@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).