From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF60FDDE46 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 09:58:21 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47C88E25.2050306@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:58:45 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Heflin Subject: Re: Sequoia build with KDBG References: <20080221213313.97814DDF55@ozlabs.org> <20080222164210.48628DE0A9@ozlabs.org> <20080222145224.7349cf36@weaponx> <200802292133.m1TLXqv3012273@e36.co.us.ibm.com> <20080229153534.684aebf9@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20080229223046.1B332DDE0A@ozlabs.org> In-Reply-To: <20080229223046.1B332DDE0A@ozlabs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Steve Heflin wrote: > I assumed that because I've always needed a debugger when > implementing kernel level components. Since you've implemented kernel > level support for several 44x processors, I just assumed that you > needed kdbg at some point. So you're saying that your additions > worked right out of the gate and you never needed a debugger? You're my hero! There are ways of debugging that don't involve a debugger. -Scott