From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD2CDDF84 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:47:37 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47CDC371.1020609@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:47:29 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc References: <1166053317.909.19.camel@praia> <20061214195842.GA14041@athena.road.mcmartin.ca> <1166362145.6714.53.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <6a89f9d50802060639j4b3a8b7u4e4e596b010ee353@mail.gmail.com> <15d7ac5a7542b05fb9b9abb5d4c7a22d@kernel.crashing.org> <18381.49853.255430.142431@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <18381.49853.255430.142431@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, henrik.sorensen@gmail.com, Stephane Marchesin , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mackerras wrote: > Segher Boessenkool writes: > >> Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Is there >> any reason to do this in assembler code at all? > > The fact that the obvious C code generates ... a call to __ucmpdi2? :) So use the correct C code, not the obvious C code. :-) -Scott