From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40ED4DE7C5 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:44:48 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47E92C02.2070102@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:44:50 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm_uart: Allocate DPRAM memory for SMC ports on CPM2-based platforms. References: <20080325160331.GB15093@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <200803251720.24667.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> In-Reply-To: <200803251720.24667.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:03, Scott Wood wrote: >> Yes, I've answered questions on the lists from at least one person using >> a custom board with cpm2 smc. > > Are you sure it wasn't me ? ;-) Yes. :-) >> Will a CPM reset blow away the portion of muram that holds the SMC pram >> pointer? If not (and I don't think it will), just return the device tree >> reg resource as is currently done if the resource is the wrong size. > > Ok I'll do that. Should I add a warning message to tell people to update the > device tree ? Sure. -Scott