From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from semihalf.com (semihalf.com [206.130.101.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D505DE1B9 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:56:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <480CC6F9.3050700@semihalf.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:55:21 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Sieka MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] 52xx: defconfigs for CM5200, Lite5200B, Motion-PRO and TQM5200 References: <20080415103635.9629.55344.stgit@pollux.denx.de> <480C9D38.3020902@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: >> Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: >> >>> Board-specific defconfigs based on current mpc5200_defconfig, archival >>> lite5200_defconfig, and [cm5200|motionpro|tqm5200]_defconfig from the >>> linux-2.6-denx tree. Kernels build using these defconfigs were verified >>> to boot with root filesystem mounted over NFS on Motion-PRO, TQM5200 >>> and Lite5200B boards. CM5200 target was not tested due to hardware >>> unavailability. >>> >> Hello Grant, >> >> There hasn't been any negitve comments on the above patch -- will you >> push it upstream via your tree? > > Yes, of course. Thanks -- is it safe to assume that the patch will make it into 2.6.26 then? Regards, Bartlomiej