From: xuwentao@cn.ibm.com
To: frowand@mvista.com, benb@m2tech.co.nz
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Why eth0 does not work
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:50:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4825691B.00152176.00@d73mta06.au.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently I only modify ppc4xx_pic_init() to init IRQ 20 and 26, which is
used by
ttys00 and eth0. That error occurs because my CPU is a ppc401 not a 405gp.
I have exported /opt/hardhat/devkit/ppc/8xx/target_ftest4 according
instructions from
mvista. The output is broken into 2 lines.
BTW, I disabled the loopback in the config file, and the msg "lo is down'
still
appears.
I start the tcpdump at the server, I found that the server recieved many
ARP packets
issued from the linux box(7.1.1.5) looking for the server(7.1.1.21). It
seems that
the box can not resolve 7.1.1.21 (can not read MAC addr, as Ben said).
Xu Wentao
IBM China Research Lab
Tel: (86-10) 62986677-216
Internet: xuwentao@cn.ibm.com
Frank Rowand <frank_rowand@mvista.com> on 2000-07-13 06:15:13 AM
Please respond to frowand@mvista.com
To: Wentao Xu <xuwentao@yahoo.com>
cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org (bcc: Wen Tao Xu/China/IBM)
Subject: Re: Why eth0 does not work
Wentao Xu wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone,
> I am porting the linux code from mvista to IBM redwood
> board. Now it seems like the eth0 is not registered
> because the NFS uses loopback device. Who can give me
> an idea? Thanks in advance.
>
> the output is
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Linux version 2.3.39 (xwt@stb_dev) (gcc version 2.95.2
> 19991024 (release)) #393
> Wed Jul 12 17:02:16 CST 2000
> walnut_setup_arch()
> ---------- progress: 0x3eab arch: exit
> On node 0 totalpages: 00001800
> zone(0): 6144 pages.
> zone(1): 0 pages.
> zone(2): 0 pages.
> ERROR: ppc4xx_pic_init() detected wrong PVR_VER
I don't know what changes you have made to ppc4xx_pic_init(), make sure you
have
initialized the pic correctly.
>
> ----- in walnut_calibrate_decr()
>
> bip:
>
> bi_s_version 1.3
> bi_r_version 1.13
> bi_memsize 0x1800000
> bi_enetaddr 123456-7890ab
> bi_pci_enetaddr 000002-f34f60
> bi_procfreq 0x2f34f60
> bi_plb_busfreq 0x4e800021
> bi_pci_busfreq 0x0
>
> Calibrating delay loop... 49.25 BogoMIPS
> Memory: 22704k available (800k kernel code, 580k data,
> 48k init) [c0000000,c1800
> 000]
> Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096
> bytes)
> Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768
> bytes)
> POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
> ---------- progress: 0xffff
> Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.3
> Based upon Swansea University Computer Society
> NET3.039
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
> NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
> IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes
> TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind
> 4096)
> Starting kswapd v1.6
> tty_init() -- calling rs_init()
> Serial driver version 4.91 (1999-11-17) with no serial
> options enabled
> ttyS00 at 0x0000 (irq = 20) is a 16550A
> tty_init() -- returned from rs_init()
> RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
> 1024 blocksize
> eth0: National DP83902AV at 12:34:56:78:90:ab, found
> at 0xf1400000, using IRQ 26
> .
> Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 7.1.1.21
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
I have seen similar messages when the driver for eth0 was not registered or
not working properly.
> portmap: server 7.1.1.21 not responding, timed out
> Root-NFS: Unable to get nfsd port number from server,
> using default
> Looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 7.1.1.21
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> portmap: server 7.1.1.21 not responding, timed out
> Root-NFS: Unable to get mountd port number from
> server, using default
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> Device lo is down.
> mount: server 7.1.1.21 not responding, timed out
> Root-NFS: Server returned error -5 while mounting
> /opt/hardhat/devkit/ppc/8xx/ta
But this may indicate that you actually were communicating with the server
over ethernet??? I haven't looked up NFS error -5. What does it mean?
Is it something as simple as needing to export your root files system
("/opt/hardhat/devkit/ppc/8xx/ta") on your host system? Did you mis-type
the path of the root file system in the command line passed to the linux
kernel or is the path just truncated in the error message?
> rget_ftest4
> VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
> request_module[block-major-2]: Root fs not mounted
> VFS: Cannot open root device 02:00
> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 02:00
> Rebooting in 180 seconds..
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Wentao
>
--
Frank Rowand <frank_rowand@mvista.com>
MontaVista Software, Inc
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2000-07-13 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-13 1:50 xuwentao [this message]
2000-07-13 4:12 ` Why eth0 does not work ben bodley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-07-17 6:21 xuwentao
2000-07-17 23:06 ` ben bodley
2000-07-12 10:21 Wentao Xu
2000-07-12 22:15 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4825691B.00152176.00@d73mta06.au.ibm.com \
--to=xuwentao@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=benb@m2tech.co.nz \
--cc=frowand@mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).