From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.scram.de (mail0.scram.de [78.47.204.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.scram.de", Issuer "scram e.V. CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B8DDDEF0 for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 05:45:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <48289E33.3030100@scram.de> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:44:51 +0200 From: Jochen Friedrich MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [WATCHDOG] mpc83xx_wdt: add support for MPC86xx CPUs References: <20080512185206.GA25818@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <64629276-8337-4FFE-B3E1-306678BF179D@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <64629276-8337-4FFE-B3E1-306678BF179D@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Kumar, >> Also move the probe code into subsys_initcall, because we want start >> pinging the watchdog ASAP, and misc devices are available in >> subsys_initcall. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov >> --- >> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 4 +- >> drivers/watchdog/mpc83xx_wdt.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> +++++---- > > we should rename it to mpc8xxx_wdt.c IIRC, even MPC8xx also has the same style of wdt device, just with a different prescale factor. Thanks, Jochen