From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4009DE078 for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 07:01:15 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4828B012.9090805@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:01:06 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [WATCHDOG] mpc83xx_wdt: add support for MPC86xx CPUs References: <20080512185206.GA25818@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <64629276-8337-4FFE-B3E1-306678BF179D@kernel.crashing.org> <20080512205303.GA14198@zarina> <4828AFBD.1040501@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <4828AFBD.1040501@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Wim Van Sebroeck List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood wrote: > It avoids confusion. I vote for renaming. Me too. How about fsl_wdt.c? Or we could come up with a name for that particular WDT device, like we did with the 85xx DMA controller.