From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037D7DE8F6 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:40:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <48481705.9080107@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:40:37 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes References: <200806041706.21557.sr@denx.de> <20080604220555.658ab13e@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <20080604231641.786bb2dd@lappy.seanm.ca> <200806050822.00797.sr@denx.de> <4848036D.5060004@freescale.com> <484809D1.2070300@scram.de> <48480B3C.9080101@freescale.com> <484811DE.9@freescale.com> <484812B9.3040300@scram.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Stefan Roese , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sean MacLennan , Scott Wood , Jean Delvare List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > 2) for i2c purposes, explicit enumeration is not needed or desired. > All the necessary data is already present in the device tree in that > i2c device nodes are children of i2c bus nodes. The i2c bus numbers > should be dynamically assigned. NACK. For ASoC driver, they cannot be dynamically assigned. I2C1 must be labeled as such. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale