From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D755C33CB2 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123C12067C for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:01:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 123C12067C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486tCp6sn9zDqKT for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:01:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486sDr09mgzDqNG for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:17:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 486sDq372qz9sRh; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:17:31 +1100 (AEDT) X-powerpc-patch-notification: thanks X-powerpc-patch-commit: 6ad4afc97bc6c5cca9786030492ddfab871ce79e In-Reply-To: <20200106042957.26494-1-yingjie_bai@126.com> To: yingjie_bai@126.com, Scott Wood , Kumar Gala From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc32/booke: consistently return phys_addr_t in __pa() Message-Id: <486sDq372qz9sRh@ozlabs.org> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:17:31 +1100 (AEDT) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jason Yan , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , Paul Mackerras , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bai Yingjie , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Allison Randal Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 04:29:53 UTC, yingjie_bai@126.com wrote: > From: Bai Yingjie > > When CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y is set, VIRT_PHYS_OFFSET is a 64bit variable, > thus __pa() returns as 64bit value. > But when CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=n, __pa() returns 32bit value. > > When CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is set, __pa() should consistently return as > 64bit value irrelevant to CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. > So we'd make __pa() consistently return phys_addr_t, which is 64bit > when CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is set. > > Signed-off-by: Bai Yingjie Series applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/6ad4afc97bc6c5cca9786030492ddfab871ce79e cheers