linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpc7448: add alias list to DTS, clean out old chosen node
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:42:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4876823A.8010005@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48767AD1.9050708@freescale.com>

Scott Wood wrote:
> Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> Scott Wood wrote:
>>> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>> OK, so does that mean that the cuboot wrapper is explicitly
>>>> not supported for all the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx boards?
>>>
>>> No (except 86xx, which doesn't have cuboot, because it never existed 
>>> in arch/ppc and thus there's no compatibility to maintain), it just 
>>> means that chosen was never added to those dts files, and thus 
>>> cuboot has no console output.
>>
>> Also note that nothing stops the causal kernel booter
>
> As opposed to the spontaneous kernel booter? :-)
>
>> from _starting_ with an arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ file,
>> adding a node to it, and using _that_.
>
> The "casual" user shouldn't need to make any changes, especially for 
> the kernel's own dts files to work with the kernel's own wrapper.
>
> The decision on whether to put the chosen node in the device tree 
> should be based on which version of u-boot it's more important to 
> maintain compatibility with (for some platforms, no chosen-duplicating 
> version of u-boot supported device trees on the platform), and what 
> the consequences of each form of incompatibility are (e.g. no console 
> output during the bootwrapper, versus no boot arguments or initrd in 
> the kernel).

Well, for the mpc7448hpc2, I can say for sure that there are
chosen-duplicating versions of u-boot 1.3.1 in use -- since
there wasn't a prebuilt, validated image newer than 1.1.3(?)
available anywhere back some 6 months ago, I'd built 1.3.1
and made it available with our 2.6.21 kernel.

If all the other boards run cuboot without console output,
then is it not consistent to have this one the same as well?
Or should we be adding chosen to the other boards instead?

Paul.

>
> -Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-10 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-10 20:21 [PATCH] mpc7448: add alias list to DTS, clean out old chosen node Paul Gortmaker
2008-07-10 20:17 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-10 20:52   ` Paul Gortmaker
2008-07-10 20:51     ` Scott Wood
2008-07-10 21:05       ` Jon Loeliger
2008-07-10 21:10         ` Scott Wood
2008-07-10 21:42           ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2008-07-10 21:45             ` Scott Wood
2008-07-10 22:17               ` Paul Gortmaker
2008-07-11  2:17 ` Roy Zang
2008-07-15 13:13 ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4876823A.8010005@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).