From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE1EDDF67 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:23:10 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <487B8B22.6050701@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:21:38 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Srinivasa D S Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] task_pt_regs for powerpc systems References: <200807071952.27427.srinivasa@in.ibm.com> <18554.33417.542066.185326@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200807141401.26917.srinivasa@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200807141401.26917.srinivasa@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Srinivasa D S wrote: > +#define task_pt_regs(tsk) (tsk)->thread.regs Shouldn't this be: #define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs) just to be safe? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale