linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:34:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXS0JL_weLvjV4+i0ZPj=N+G6Vs1WDE9jffGUWehq5Xzg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 09:47:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,24 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) && defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC)
> 
> s/defined/IS_ENABLED/ for the modular case.

Thanks, fixed in all three architectures/

> > @@ -95,7 +112,10 @@ static int __init rtc_init(void)
> >         if (!mach_hwclk)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -       pdev = platform_device_register_simple("rtc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +       /* or just call devm_rtc_device_register instead? */
> 
> I guess this comment is a bogus leftover? There's no "dev" parameter to
> pass to devm_rtc_device_register() here.

Sort of. When I wrote it, I thought that a NULL argument would work,
and I later found out myself that it doesn't.

I'll drop the comment there, but there are still a few ways we (probably
not me, but whoever is interested) could take this further:

- register both the device and the driver here, and call
  devm_rtc_device_register from the probe function so we can move away
  from drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c

- do this separately for mac, mvme147, mvme16x, sun3, q40 and sun3x

- move the six implementations into drivers/rtc as standalone drivers.

One (AFAIK) unsolved problem here is the question of how to handle
read_boot_clock/read_persistent_clock/update_persistent_clock in this
case. This is a really odd API that is implemented in various ways
on a few major architectures, and not at all on others, so it's all
highly inconsistent.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-27 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-26 21:52 [PATCH v2 0/6] simplify rtc-generic driver Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rtc: m68k: provide rtc_class_ops directly Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27  7:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-27 10:34     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rtc: m68k: provide ioctl for q40 Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] rtc: powerpc: provide rtc_class_ops directly Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] rtc: parisc: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27  0:22   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-27 10:10     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] rtc: sh: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] rtc: generic: remove get_rtc_time/set_rtc_time wrappers Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] simplify rtc-generic driver Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4888267.R0sXv0tuDQ@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).