From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.sh.mvista.com (unknown [63.81.120.155]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D6FDE5AF for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:18:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <48A19BC2.8060008@ru.mvista.com> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:18:42 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_of_platform: fix no irq handling References: <48A05152.7020508@harris.com> <20080811151913.GA14690@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <48A0676E.5020308@harris.com> <20080811170756.GA29827@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <1218492032.8041.11.camel@pasglop> <48A19788.6050502@harris.com> <20080812140457.GA9103@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080812140457.GA9103@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , "Sparks, Sam" , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Vorontsov wrote: >>>>1. IDE status read does not work. (But am I understand correctly >>>> that IDE works well if IRQ is unspecified? Then this is hardly >>>> an issue.) >>>>2. IDE interrupt comes when it should not. I'd recommend to use >>>> oscilloscope to find out what is happening there, that is, if >>>> the drive actually deasserts its irq line after status read. >>>> If so, than this could be a PIC problem. >>>>What is the platform on which you're observing the issue, btw? >>>Another possibility is that you got the wrong interrupt number >>>in the device-tree... >>>Ben. >>The platform is the AMCC Sequoia board. We've built a little adapter to >>connect a compact flash card to the processor bus. I believe the >>interrupt selection in the device tree is correct, and I've checked over >>the u-boot settings for the IRQ line (active high, level sensitive). > IDE IRQs are active-low. Only on the PCI and only in the native mode. Natively, the IDE INTRQ signal is active-high, rising edge triggering, as on ISA. You seem to have an invertor somewhere, if it's not a PCI chip... WBR, Sergei