From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA8CDE058 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:42:04 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <48B6E62D.4060606@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:53:49 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: add Freescale QE/CPM USB peripheral controller driver References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, Arnd Bergmann , greg@kroah.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Li Yang List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alan Stern wrote: > This was done deliberately. The relevant standards state that a USB > device can have no more than one peripheral interface. Does building a kernel image that can run on different hardware without rebuilding also violate the "relevant standards"? And who's to say that there aren't multiple USB devices on a single board, that just happen to share a CPU and memory? :-) -Scott