From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx.linux.net.cn (unknown [210.82.31.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FA8DE144 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:30:26 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <48DB5A2F.4030502@linux.net.cn> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:30:23 +0800 From: Wang Jian MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leo Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_platform struct resource signness fix References: <20080925083622.GA2701@debian> <2a27d3730809250212q4092d0bbyc6aa68723ff22c29@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a27d3730809250212q4092d0bbyc6aa68723ff22c29@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , As I said, I didn't spend much time on the issue, so I don't know which patch is better. (But I do think the patch to pata_of_platform.c is better ATM). AFAIK, powerpc is the only consumer of pata_of_platform.c, so I think this list is better for discussion. I should cc: Anton Vorontsov but last time I cc: him I got bounced. Leo Li wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Wang Jian wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch is to pata_platform.c but at this time, it's powerpc specific >> because it can only be triggerred using openfirmware, so I post the patch >> here. The patch is against 2.6.26-rc8. > > Powerpc isn't the only arch to use openfirmware. Anyway, you have to > cc linux-ide@vger.kernel.org if you want the patch to be merged. > > - Leo > >