From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDFA8DDEF1 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:17:04 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <48E393E6.7000505@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:14:46 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Remi Lefevre Subject: Re: FS_ENET ERROR(s) 0x12 at second NFS RPC port lookup (100005/1) References: <4e0b9cb00809300944r2c2359dbx6df882705106c4d1@mail.gmail.com> <48E262FF.9020108@freescale.com> <4e0b9cb00810010636h10c0d1fw3385ecf1f0a27be5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4e0b9cb00810010636h10c0d1fw3385ecf1f0a27be5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Remi Lefevre wrote: > Errors encountered are "Underrun" errors (from bd). Try elevating the arbiter priority for the FCC. > CPM clock-frequency is not defined in the DTS, neither filled by U-Boot, > but it doesn't seem to be needed, does it ? Not for ethernet. > I'm a little confused, and find strange that the first UDP request completes > correctly, as well as latter ARP ones. If it's bus contention (as underrun implies), then it may happen only under load. -Scott