From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e33.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346B8474C2 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:36:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m91IaLeX009075 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:36:21 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m91IaLnd062868 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:36:21 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m91IaLud001948 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:36:21 -0600 Message-ID: <48E3C318.3040507@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:06:08 +0530 From: Mohan Kumar M MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove legacy kdump kernel build support References: <20080930124828.GA1945@in.ibm.com> <20080930172540.GA21378@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080930172540.GA21378@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: ppcdev , paulus@samba.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 06:18:28PM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote: >> Remove legacy kdump kernel build support >> Hi, I have submitted the patch to support relocatable kdump kernel with retaining legacy kdump build support. Regards, Mohan. > > Can we leave the legacy support for a while? On PPC32 we don't have > the relocatable kernel support, but we have kdump patches floating > around[1], and they use the `hard-coded values' approach, so far. > > I'm not sure if anybody is currently working on a PPC32 kernel > relocation support.. but for sure it will take some time to implement. > > Thanks, > > [1] http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-August/061161.html >