From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e3.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270F8DDEE0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:44:49 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m935iZwZ002668 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:44:35 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m935iPgn277288 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:44:25 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m935iPxc018395 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:44:25 -0400 Message-ID: <48E5B134.6050506@in.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:14:20 +0530 From: Mohan Kumar M MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: dtb and purgatory support for ppc32 References: <1222896024-22172-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <1222896024-22172-4-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <7AB33E84-B8C2-4B32-B1F8-7FA213198FE4@kernel.crashing.org> <48E47D38.3040508@linutronix.de> <20081002100553.GA5886@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20081002100553.GA5886@verge.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sebastian Siewior , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > I'm not speaking on behalf of Kumar Gala, just on behalf of myself. > Hi Horms, > I would like to get some review of this patch by if possible. > Also, I'm a little unclear of how it will interact with the > patches that Mohan Kumar sent this week. But at this point > I don't see any particular need to break the patch up into > smaller pieices. > My patches are meant for PPC64 only. The patch implements support for relocatable kdump kernel on PPC64 platform. So I don't think Sebastian's patches need to support this relocation support in the kexec-tools as of now. Regards, Mohan.