From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from venus.billgatliff.com (venus.billgatliff.com [209.251.101.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE49ADE3D1 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:03:26 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <48EF60B6.20409@billgatliff.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:03:34 -0500 From: Bill Gatliff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API References: <1223608819.8157.127.camel@pasglop> <48EED4D1.2040506@billgatliff.com> <20081010093642.GA10579@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20081010093642.GA10579@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux/PPC Development , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mundt wrote: > This is likely because some of those lists are subscribers only, so cross > posting is poor form. It makes sense to keep the discussion in one place, > and to send notification messages with a pointer to the list archives to > the other lists so folks can jump in if they really care. Splitting it > out doesn't help matters in the least, but unfortunately this is what > seems to happen the most when subscribers only lists are involved. Alright, then maybe I can do this when I post the "final" changeset for review: cross-post to lkml and linux-embedded, and then post one short note on l-a-k, linuxppc-dev and elsewhere that refers those interested to the actual content. I can live with that. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com